SearchSupport ReformAny amount helps!
Reform NewsTopicsUser loginVote ReformOrganizationNavigationUpcoming eventsActive forum topicsNew forum topicsBrowse archives
PollWho's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 18 guests online.
Who's new
Recent blog posts
|
NewsGingrich: Romney has earned the GOP nominationWASHINGTON (AP) -- Former White House candidate Newt Gingrich says Mitt Romney has "earned the right to represent the Republican Party" against President Barack Obama and that he'll help Romney's campaign in any way he can....
Man held in city murder inquiryTayside Police say they have arrested a 43-year-old man in connection with the murder of Dundee man John Kennedy.
Appeal following railway deathTransport police appeal for help after the death of a man whose body was found on railway tracks near Bridgend station.
Who's who? Obama, Romney projecting mirror imageWASHINGTON (AP) -- He's a smug, Harvard-trained elitist who doesn't get how regular Americans are struggling these days. More extreme than he lets on, he's keeping his true agenda hidden until after Election Day. He's clueless about fixing the economy, over his head on foreign policy. Who is he?...
Angry Greeks vote in key parliamentary electionATHENS, Greece (AP) -- Greeks hammered by two years of deep spending cuts voted Sunday in a parliamentary election critical to the country's prospects for pulling itself out of a deep financial crisis that has roiled global markets and threatened Greece's position in the eurozone....
Biden says no `stagnation' in employment numbersWASHINGTON (AP) -- Vice President Joe Biden says the latest job numbers show an economy still struggling to recover, but not one where hiring suddenly has stalled, which he says just might if Mitt Romney is elected....
Biden says no `stagnation' in employment numbersWASHINGTON (AP) -- Vice President Joe Biden says the latest job numbers show an economy still struggling to recover, but not one where hiring suddenly has stalled, which he says just might if Mitt Romney is elected....
Biden says no `stagnation' in employment numbersWASHINGTON (AP) -- Vice President Joe Biden says the latest job numbers show an economy still struggling to recover, but not one where hiring suddenly has stalled, which he says just might if Mitt Romney is elected....
Biden says no `stagnation' in employment numbersWASHINGTON (AP) -- Vice President Joe Biden says the latest job numbers show an economy still struggling to recover, but not one where hiring suddenly has stalled, which he says just might if Mitt Romney is elected....
Biden scoffs at bin Laden view of VP's leadershipWASHINGTON (AP) -- Vice President Joe Biden says he hopes Osama bin Laden was wrong in his assessment that Biden would not be able to lead the nation if the president was killed....
FBI works to identify 2 dead; mom, kids have been missingStoner eases to win in PortugalCasey Stoner holds off Jorge Lorenzo and Dani Pedrosa to win in Portugal and take the lead in the MotoGP standings.
Voters punish Greece's centrist partiesSir Bobby statue for NewcastleA statue of Sir Bobby Robson is unveiled outside the south-west corner of Newcastle United's ground.
2 NATO members killed in AfghanistanKS: Officer's sticking foot under closing garage door to open it was unreasonable entry into homeOfficer following a DUI suspect home watched defendant pull into his garage. As the garage door was closing, she stuck her foot in to stop the door from closing. This was an unreasonable entry of the home without a warrant or exigent circumstances. The police had probable cause, but all the state's claimed exigent circumstances were considered and rejected. State v. Dugan, 2012 Kan. App. LEXIS 49 (May 4, 2012): he United States Constitution draws a line at the threshold of a person's home over which law enforcement officers may not step without a warrant from a judge or exigent circumstances so compelling as to override that fundamental right. The Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches of dwellings or seizures of their occupants reflects a tenet the founders considered essential to the ordered liberty they fought a war to achieve and then cherished as this nation matured. That prohibition is no less significant nearly two and a half centuries into this country's maturation. The comparatively mundane facts of this case belie the magnitude of the constitutional right and the significance of the constitutional issue—when government agents may claim exigency to override Fourth Amendment protections of citizens in their own homes. I. Factual and Procedural History The Douglas County District Court denied a motion to suppress evidence a Lawrence police officer obtained after she stuck her foot in a garage door to keep it from closing and then entered a private home to search and seize Defendant Troy E. Dugan based on a reported misdemeanor traffic offense. The district court found the officer's actions did not offend the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Although the question might be closer than some, we do not share the district court's tolerance for the governmental breach of a private residence and, therefore, reverse that ruling with directions the motion be granted. . . . The courts have generally recognized four types of exigent circumstances that may obviate the warrant requirement: (1) preventing harm to law enforcement officers or others by capturing a dangerous suspect, see Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294, 298-99, 87 S. Ct. 1642, 18 L. Ed. 2d 782 (1967); (2) securing evidence in the face of its imminent loss, see King, 131 S. Ct. at 1853-54; (3) hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect, see United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38, 42-43, 96 S. Ct. 2406, 49 L. Ed. 2d 300 (1976) ; and (4) thwarting escape of a suspect, see Welsh, 466 U.S. at 754. Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91, 100, 110 S. Ct. 1684, 109 L. Ed. 2d 85 (1990) (noting those exigent circumstances); United States v. Struckman, 603 F.3d 731, 743 (9th Cir. 2010) (cataloging exigent circumstances). Those categories of exigency are not exclusive, and the facts of a given case might support some different imperative rendering a search or seizure constitutionally reasonable under the Fourth Amendment without a warrant. Struckman, 603 F.3d 743 ("no immutable list of exigent circumstances"); United States v. Plavcak, 411 F.3d 655, 663 (6th Cir. 2005). Likewise, the factual scenario in a given case might implicate multiple exigencies, suggesting a greater likelihood of reasonableness. See Santana, 427 U.S. at 43 (While hot pursuit "was sufficient to justify the warrantless entry into Santana's house," the narcotics officers also had "a realistic expectation" that Santana would try to dispose of illegal drugs on the premises.). The courts have recognized an allied exception when a warrantless entry reasonably appears necessary to assist persons who are seriously injured or face imminent injury. Brigham City, 547 U.S. at 403 (recognizing emergency assistance doctrine as warrant exception); State v. Geraghty, 38 Kan. App. 2d 114, 123-24, 163 P.3d 350 (2007). The emergency assistance exception to the warrant requirement stands on a somewhat different legal footing than the "exigent circumstances." The exigent circumstances all entail conventional law enforcement functions related to taking individuals into custody or securing evidence. As stated, they require the officers have probable cause. The emergency assistance exception neither implicates that kind of law enforcement action nor requires probable cause. Brigham City, 547 U.S. at 403; Geraghty, 38 Kan. App. 2d at 122. The emergency assistance exception applies when a government agent enters a dwelling or other private place for the purpose of rendering emergency aid to a person in serious peril. The agent must have a reasonable factual basis to believe an emergency threatening life or property is imminent or ongoing and to believe the place entered is associated with that threat. The agent may not use the emergency as a subterfuge to effect a search for evidence or a seizure of a criminal suspect. 38 Kan. App. 2d at 123-24. This case does not implicate the emergency assistance doctrine. III. State's Claimed Exigencies Insufficient In this case, the State argues hot pursuit and preservation of evidence justified entering Dugan's home without first getting a warrant. We consider each of those bases in turn and find insufficient grounds to support a constitutional entry, a seizure of Dugan, or a search of him or the premises without a warrant. The United States Supreme Court has noted "the burden is on the government to demonstrate exigent circumstances that overcome the presumption of unreasonableness that attaches to all warrantless home entries." Welch, 466 U.S. at 750. Taking a scythe to the Bill of RightsJim McGovern, a Democrat from Massachusetts, has proposed a constitutional amendment that would limit and control free speech in drastically unimaginable ways.
9/11 hearing proceeds in bite-sized chunksChaotic start to 9/11 hearings at Guantanamo Bay
IN: When state relies on inventory, for all practical purposes, they have to put it into evidenceThe state did not prove the standardized policy for an inventory, so it fails in this case. The state does not have to rely on a statute, and policy is good enough. Although case law has not indicated the policy needs to be admitted into evidence, others have said that it is relevant. Berry v. State, 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 216 (May 3, 2012). The court almost, but doesn’t quite, hold that the policy must be admitted. Considering the outcome, that is a logical conclusion: Despite characterizing Officer Sherrell's testimony as describing the "primary operating procedure prior to towing a vehicle," the record lacks any evidence of Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department policy on impoundment. (Appellee's Br. p. 4). Thus, we cannot say whether Officer Sherrell's discretion to impound Berry's vehicle was in keeping with such policy. Furthermore, although the State argues that Berry has cited no case law for the proposition that a written law enforcement policy must be introduced into evidence to justify impoundment, we note that other cases have found formal policies relevant in justifying impoundment. See Peete v. State, 678 N.E.2d 415, 420 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997), trans. denied (Indianapolis Police Department policy on impoundment). Consequently, we conclude that the State failed to prove that an exception to the warrant requirement existed at the time of the inventory search of Berry's car. Arctic oil deal signed by RosneftRussian oil giant Rosneft signs a deal with Norway's Statoil to explore the sea around the Arctic.
|
InfoWars.comTruthNews.US - News
www.NewsWithViews.com
News
|
Recent comments
16 years 17 weeks ago
16 years 48 weeks ago
18 years 34 weeks ago
18 years 45 weeks ago
18 years 46 weeks ago
18 years 47 weeks ago
18 years 47 weeks ago
18 years 47 weeks ago
19 years 1 day ago
19 years 1 day ago