VoteKansas.org

Army Times | Roughly 3,000 soldiers — and likely more — are expected to serve tours across the continent in 2013, training foreign militaries and aiding locals.

Policy Mic | So Spain is the latest country within the Eurozone saga to formally ask for money.

You Tube | Did figures from U.S. politics like John Kerry violate the Logan Act by attending?

Wayne Madsen | This year’s Bilderberg conference featured three guests from Russia, all leading anti-Putin politicians.

Washington Post | “It took me 10 years to figure out that I have a large karmic debt to pay for the number of Cokes I sold across this country.”

You Tube | Video shows just how un-sure 'Mitt Romney' is about almost everything in the world.

ABC News | Somali al-Qaeda affiliate mock the $33 million bounty on its top leaders by offering a bounty of their own.

Mail Online | Recent sky event in the Middle East has UFO theorists going nuts with speculation.

Waki Waki | The transhumanist symbolism and techo-foreshadowing hidden in the film Prometheus is even deeper than we first thought.

Reuters | Yesterday, we reported IMF's recommendation for a $46 Billion Euro loan; today the loan climbs to $100 billion.

Business Insider | Some Chinese companies can remotely access communications technology sold to U.S.

Press TV | Brzezinski appears to be undermining his own doctrine with latest interview on MSNBC.

Noel Brinkerhoff | Nuclear weapons makers have donated more than $18 million to current, key members of Congress.

All Gov | Of terrorism-related deaths worldwide in 2010-2011, Americans accounted for only 0.124%.

In a combined First and Fourth Amendment case, plaintiff was at a city council meeting to speak, and he was animated and concerned others when they determined he was armed. He was removed from the meeting, and it was determined that he was a law enforcement officer, so they let him back in. The decision to remove him was reasonable under the circumstances. Sandefur v. Hanover Park, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79412 (N.D. Ill. June 7, 2012)*:

Here, the court finds it significant that the stop took place in the context of a Village Board meeting. The situation is thus somewhat different from a typical Terry stop of an individual on the street. In the public setting of a Village Board meeting, the potential consequences of failing to apprehend an individual about to commit a crime are significantly enhanced, for any criminal activity is a threat not only to the order of the meeting, but also to the safety of all present. A stop that would not be justified on the street might therefore be reasonable in the setting and circumstances of a public meeting.

With that backdrop, the court determines that there was reasonable suspicion to seize Sandefur at the meeting, take him to the hallway, and search him. As explained above, the defendants had observed that Sandefur was carrying a concealed weapon, and they were not aware that he was a law enforcement officer. Moreover, Sandefur was very animated as he addressed the Board. The defendants were thus justified in attempting to ascertain whether Sandefur was legitimately carrying the weapon. Moreover, the search was minimally intrusive, for it lasted no longer than necessary to ascertain that Sandefur was a law enforcement officer and involved only as much force as necessary to secure Sandefur and prevent any potential harm to the attendees of the meeting. Within only a few minutes of the commencement of the search, Sandefur was free to leave.

Defendant consented to a search that led the officer to determine that a dog sniff was required. He explained it to the defendant, and defendant’s acquiescence expanded the consent. The officer did not have to remove a duffle bag from the car before having the drug dog smell it. United States v. Hill, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79250 (N.D. Ga. June 7, 2012).*

Plaintiff sufficiently pled trespass by border patrol officers coming on his property and assault and battery for nearly driving into him because he attempted to take their picture with his cell phone camera. Moher v. United States, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79443 (W.D. Mich. June 8, 2012).*

Defendant was in custody, but the state can meet his heavy burden of showing consent without having Mirandized the defendant. People v. McCray, 2012 NY Slip Op 4579, 2012 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4489 (4th Dept. June 8, 2012).*

The Information Underground | Leon Panetta wants to move 60 percent of U.S. naval forces to the Pacific region. Why?

In a § 1983 case, the fact a state or local employee lacks statutory arrest authority has no bearing on the Fourth Amendment question of probable cause. Saunders v. Silva, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 11509 (9th Cir. June 7, 2012):

The district court found that Silva seized Saunders when he ordered her to leave church and return to her home. It further found that this seizure was unreasonable because Silva, as a Deputy Animal Control Officer within the Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, lacked the authority to conduct an arrest. Although Silva was not authorized under Arizona law to arrest Saunders, "state restrictions [on arrest authority] do not alter the Fourth Amendment's protections." Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164, 176 (2008). To constitute a Fourth Amendment violation, an arrest by a state officer must be unreasonable under the United States Constitution, rather than simply not in compliance with state laws. See United States v. Becerra-Garcia, 397 F.3d 1167, 1174-75 (9th Cir. 2005).

A psychology professor writes: There is now substantial research showing that people who consume porn are indeed inclined to attitudes and behavior incompatible with strong family relationships based on affection and care for children. Frequent consumption of pornography is associated with: sexually aggressive behavior toward women, particularly for men who are prone to sexual aggression and Rogerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03474078324293158376noreply@blogger.com0

Tony Cartalucci | German paper FAZ reports Houla was the work of rebels, not pro-Assad militias.