Issues

TN: CODIS hit from prior arrest that had no conviction was still valid

FourthAmendment.com - News - Sat, 2024-11-30 01:37

Defendant was convicted of rape and murder based on a CODIS hit. His previous DNA draw was the result of his Tennessee arrest on a Mississippi fugitive warrant for a violent offense there. While the Mississippi charge had been dropped, Tennessee was never told. He was actually a felon, so no harm, no foul. State v. Scott, 2012 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 302 (May 10, 2012).*

The state concedes that the traffic stop that led to the smell of marijuana wasn’t legal after all. Riggle v. State, 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 222 (May 10, 2012).*

The trial court apparently discounted the officer’s testimony that defendant was following a tractor-trailer too close when the officer stopped him for a lack of proof of the traffic offense. When defendant refused to consent to a search, the officer got out a drug dog. The court of criminal appeals affirmed because the evidence does not preponderate against the finding. State v. Baldwin, 2012 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 294 (May 10, 2012).*

Idaho Ron Paul Supporters Plan to Take Control of State Convention

TruthNews.US - News - Sat, 2024-11-30 01:37
New American | Word out of Idaho is that the Ron Paul bloc in the Gem State’s GOP, perhaps encouraged by recent events at the Nevada and Maine state Republican conventions, plans to attempt a similar strategy.

OH8: Automobile exception justified search of trunk of receiver of stolen cell phones

FourthAmendment.com - News - Sat, 2024-11-30 01:37

Defendant was a suspect in receiving cell phones stolen from Wal-Mart. The police recorded him talking with their CI who worked for Wal-Mart and he took a bag of phones and put them in his trunk. The trunk could be searched for the cell phones under the automobile exception. State v. Kamleh, 2012 Ohio 2061, 2012 Ohio App. LEXIS 1810 (8th Dist. May 10, 2012).*

The legality of the inventory of defendant’s car was moot where defendant fled from the car at the time of the stop. Wilson v. State, 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 219 (May 9, 2012).*

The district court did not clearly err in finding that consent was voluntary. The fact one person in the house was in custody did not mean that the consenter was. Also, there admittedly was no warning of a right to refuse, but that is only a factor in the totality. United States v. Graham, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 9605 (9th Cir. May 11, 2012).*

Will Arpaio's popularity continue amid lawsuit?

PHOENIX (AP) — The careers of most politicians would crumble under the heavy scrutiny that the self-proclaimed toughest sheriff in America now faces.

But despite a mountain of legal troubles, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio remains popular with voters and has more than $3.4 million in the bank for his ...

California facing higher $16 billion shortfall

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California's budget deficit has swelled to a projected $16 billion — much larger than had been predicted just months ago — and will force severe cuts to schools and public safety if voters fail to approve tax increases in November, Gov. Jerry Brown said Saturday.

The ...

Long live ‘our’ Gulf bastards

TruthNews.US - News - Sat, 2024-11-30 01:37
Pepe Escobar | Life is a golden gift from Allah if you’re a certified member of the Gulf Counter-Revolution Club (GCC), also known as the Gulf Cooperation Council.

Two-Faced Emperor Obamney Vs. The Incorruptible St. Paul

TruthNews.US - News - Sat, 2024-11-30 01:37
Saman Mohammadi | Ron Paul stands on one side with his head held high and his heart firmly attached to America, while on the other side are Obama and Romney.
Syndicate content