SearchSupport ReformAny amount helps!
Reform NewsTopicsUser loginVote ReformOrganizationNavigationEvents
Upcoming eventsActive forum topicsNew forum topicsBrowse archives
PollWho's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 9 guests online.
Who's new
Recent blog posts
|
IssuesI Led With the Cross 5-6-10I Led With the Cross 5-6-10
PRUDEN: A discount on the 2-cent endorsementANALYSIS/OPINION: In the age of the Internet, when everybody wants to get his two cents into the debate and anybody can invent his own facts and rant in a blog or sometimes even a newspaper column, endorsements don't mean much. They particularly don't mean much coming from a congressman. Endorsements ... Romney rips Obama campaign 'infomercial'Obama makes plug for manufacturing networkRomney dismisses Obama campaign filmIllegal Immigration is a Happy Invasion 5-6-10Illegal Immigration is a Happy Invasion 5-6-10
A "Bold New World" and "Forces Too Powerful," Part 4, 11-14-11A "Bold New World" and "Forces Too Powerful," Part 4, 11-14-11
What About the Right to Have a Father? 8-26-10What About the Right to Have a Father? 8-26-10
Ground Zero Mosque: It's Their Touchdown Dance 8-26-10Ground Zero Mosque: It's Their Touchdown Dance 8-26-10
ars technica: "Obama admin wants warrantless access to cell phone location data"ars technica: Obama admin wants warrantless access to cell phone location data by Timothy B. Lee: A Maryland court last week ruled that the government does not need a warrant to force a cell phone provider to disclose more than six months of data on the movements of one of its customers. Two defendants had been accused of armed robbery, and a key piece of evidence against them was data about the movements of the pair's cell phones. The defendants had sought to suppress this location evidence because the government did not get a warrant before seeking the data from network providers. But last Thursday, Judge Richard D. Bennett ruled that a warrant is not required to obtain cell-site location records (CSLR) from a wireless carrier. Courts all over the country have been wrestling with this question, and the government has been on something of a winning streak. While one court ruled last year that such information requests violate the Fourth Amendment, most others have reached the opposite conclusion. The Obama administration laid out its position in a legal brief last month, arguing that customers have "no privacy interest" in CSLR held by a network provider. Under a legal principle known as the "third-party doctrine," information voluntarily disclosed to a third party ceases to enjoy Fourth Amendment protection. The government contends that this rule applies to cell phone location data collected by a network provider. Saved From What? 12-16-10Saved From What? 12-16-10
Setting the stage for America's degraded future, Part 2, 12-16-10Setting the stage for America's degraded future, Part 2, 12-16-10
Allan Meltzer: A Look at the Global One PercentAmerican Scene: Federal court takes over BP's Gulf oil spill claimsLOUISIANA Federal court takes over BP's Gulf oil spill claims NEW ORLEANS | The man who has overseen the long, complicated job of paying out billions of dollars to the victims of the BP oil spill was relieved of his duties Thursday when a federal court took over the claims ... In wired generation, students like paper for campus newsStudents at Doane College in Crete, Neb., come from their classes and dorms, pick up their lunches and proceed to step back in time. The millennials seek out an honest-to-goodness, dead-tree, processed-pulp newspaper, handed out by the paper's staff, to catch the midday dining rush. "It's strange. These kids are ... Colleges find ways to foil pro-gun rulingsDENVER — Courts are ruling in favor of allowing those with concealed-carry permits to bring their handguns on campus, but universities are figuring out ways to keep the guns out. Gun rights advocates recently notched major legal victories in Colorado and Oregon, with courts in both states agreeing that ... Agriculture official defends vigilance on food stampsObama administration officials at a House hearing Thursday tried to push back against recent investigative reports detailing problems and fraud in the nation's food-stamp program. Fraud is down to 1 percent - or a penny on the dollar - in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as the ... Michael Medved: Meet the Republicans, Education BashersCasey, Graham and Lieberman: Iran Can't Be Allowed Nuclear 'Capability' |
InfoWars.comTruthNews.US - News
www.NewsWithViews.com
News
|
Recent comments
14 years 46 weeks ago
15 years 25 weeks ago
17 years 11 weeks ago
17 years 22 weeks ago
17 years 23 weeks ago
17 years 23 weeks ago
17 years 23 weeks ago
17 years 23 weeks ago
17 years 29 weeks ago
17 years 29 weeks ago